DanielLC comments on The Problem With Rational Wiki - Less Wrong

20 [deleted] 26 October 2012 11:31AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (61)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 26 October 2012 12:06:12PM *  9 points [-]

What else remains? What other plausible function does it serve?

It keeps the riff-raff out of LessWrong.

Comment author: DanielLC 26 October 2012 11:53:58PM 6 points [-]

Is that a good thing? We can hardly raise the sanity waterline if only the most sane people hang out here.

Comment author: [deleted] 27 October 2012 10:50:25AM 8 points [-]

Honestly I'm much more concerned about LessWrong staying as sane as it is. Overall I think there are several negative indications.

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 28 October 2012 08:35:41AM *  4 points [-]

Honestly I'm much more concerned about LessWrong staying as sane as it is. Overall I think there are several negative indications.

I agree. I always thought the "raising the sanity waterline" was a substitute for "refining the art of human rationality", not a compliment. Imagine if the Logical Empiricists tried recruiting everyday people rather than the scientific elite (and other scientifically literate philosophers)? I fear that HPMOR, while I've gotten a lot of value from it, was the beginning of the end for this place. At the very least, I think these efforts should be spun off as much as possible (and without links leading back here). I say, let self-selection effects do their thing.

Comment author: David_Gerard 28 October 2012 09:10:53PM 3 points [-]

CFAR appears to be precisely this.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 27 October 2012 05:54:56AM *  0 points [-]

The think the more sane getting more sane raises the water line.

EDIT - Even I don't know what the hell I was saying here.