David_Gerard comments on The Problem With Rational Wiki - Less Wrong

20 [deleted] 26 October 2012 11:31AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (61)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gwern 29 October 2012 04:26:12PM *  6 points [-]

But what is the context here? I mean, I'd find it perfectly plausible for a chosen academic to turn down a SI grant because she doesn't want to be associated - but Briggs already had accepted the grant, apparently in all seriousness.

Comment author: David_Gerard 29 October 2012 04:34:14PM 0 points [-]

I mean the context of the quote in the email. There's basically no other detail.

Comment author: gwern 29 October 2012 04:40:22PM 7 points [-]

Ah. Well, my general question still stands: it can't be as simple as just not wanting to be associated, since then she would not have accepted in the first place, so what changed? It's hard to imagine that XiXi's idée fixe, the basilisk, would make her turn it down, and I can't think of any recent scandals like newspaper headlines screaming 'Yudkowsky caught acausally molesting catgirls!' which might do the trick

So my best guess is the other mentioned possibility: she didn't think she could do anything worthwhile with TDT, which is interesting to me since I read a few of her papers and they were pretty good but other people who seem smarter than me and much better at decision theory think TDT is interesting and novel and a good starting point for more work!