= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Kindly comments on Original Research on Less Wrong - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (47)
In the course of figuring out what the hell the parent comment was talking about and how one was supposed to do the calculation, I found this. p-values are much clearer for me now, thanks for bringing this up.
That is a really interesting paper.
Also, I found that the function R_k in Section 2 has the slightly-more-closed formula
) where P_k(x) is the first k terms of the Taylor series for e^x (and has the formula with factorials and everything). Just in case anyone wants to try this at home.