= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Sniffnoy comments on Beyond Bayesians and Frequentists - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (51)
Well, Cox's Theorem still assumes that you're representing belief-strengths with real numbers in the first place. Really you should go back to Savage's Theorem... :)