Eugine_Nier comments on In Defense of Moral Investigation - Less Wrong

-5 Post author: MTGandP 04 November 2012 04:26AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (78)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MTGandP 06 November 2012 04:13:07AM -1 points [-]

Does that only hold for people of African descent?

I think it's especially true in that case for historical reasons, but you're right, I think it does apply for any race.

Could you describe what you would consider robust evidence?

Any sort of evidence that demonstrates a genetic difference in intelligence (putting aside difficulties in accurately measuring intelligence—IQ is not intelligence). AFAIK, all evidence to date can be explained by environmental differences.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 07 November 2012 05:03:40AM 3 points [-]

all evidence to date can be explained by environmental differences.

It seems like you may be privileging the hypothesis that the cause are non-genetic.

Comment author: wedrifid 07 November 2012 11:54:46AM *  5 points [-]

It seems like you may be privileging the hypothesis that the cause are non-genetic.

And also priveleging the hypothesis that the distribution of the trait we call 'intelligence' happened to develop exactly in proportion among the various spatially isolated populations while most other traits diverged.

Comment author: MTGandP 07 November 2012 05:57:58PM -1 points [-]

I don't necessarily believe that all races are equally intelligent. I just don't think we have enough evidence to say either way.