Eugine_Nier comments on Rationality Quotes November 2012 - Less Wrong

6 [deleted] 06 November 2012 10:38PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (898)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 25 November 2012 08:06:52PM *  2 points [-]

I wasn't referring to death not being in the present. Rather, the problem with the statement

in order for someone to be dead, they both have to exist (insofar as they have a property, namely 'being dead') and not exist (because they're dead!).

is that it assumes that because the person doesn't exist in the present, it isn't meaningful to talk about that person existing at all.

Comment author: [deleted] 25 November 2012 08:31:35PM 0 points [-]

Ahh, I see, that's a very good point. So you would say that Socrates, despite being dead, nevertheless exists now as someone who is dead.

I suppose if we've got a block-time view of things anyway, existence wouldn't have much of anything to do with presentness.

I like that answer.