From the quote, it sounds like its a question of whether odds lower than one's prior should increase or decrease excitement when the stakes are high.
The quote seems to me to be about how, if you predict something is only about 35% likely, and that thing happens, that's not sufficient evidence to assume you predicted wrong or to throw out your methodology. The line about the million dollars looks like an example to back up the prior sentence, "that's a pretty good chance". Other than that example, the quote doesn't seem to be about excitement at all really.
From Ezra Klein:
Okay, technically, winning the money would be very weak Bayesian evidence that the initial probability estimate was wrong. Still a very good quote.