gwern comments on 2012 Less Wrong Census/Survey - Less Wrong

65 Post author: Yvain 03 November 2012 11:00PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (733)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gwern 04 November 2012 12:05:51AM 6 points [-]

I'm pretty sure it doesn't. At least, if it does I have no idea what the 'ontologically basic mental events' qualifiers were about...

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 04 November 2012 12:22:32AM 3 points [-]

I honestly considered answering "Mu" to the questions that mentioned 'ontologically basic mental events' since I don't think "ontologically basic" is a meaningful concept.

Comment author: [deleted] 04 November 2012 02:11:27PM *  0 points [-]

In a similar vein, I think the one about religious views should list ignosticism (and apatheism, for that matter).

Comment author: BlazeOrangeDeer 07 November 2012 02:08:47AM 1 point [-]

I think it meant "not made of smaller parts", for example ghosts would be disembodied consciousnesses not made of any atoms. I thought this was incredibly unlikely.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 07 November 2012 05:40:42AM 0 points [-]

For some types of entities it's not clear what that means. For example, are particles made of wave functions, or are wave functions made of particles.