lukeprog comments on Room for more funding at the Future of Humanity Institute - Less Wrong

18 Post author: John_Maxwell_IV 16 November 2012 08:45PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (15)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: lukeprog 16 November 2012 11:43:01PM 4 points [-]

I assume that one reason individual donations can be especially valuable is if they free FHI researchers up from writing grant proposals so they can spend more time doing actual research.

Correct.

In fact, it might be the best use of additional funding for FHI. An additional 10 hours of x-risk work (rather than grant-writing) from Nick Bostrom or Stuart Armstrong is hard to beat in terms of x-risk reduction purchased per dollar. (The other 'core' FHI researcher, Anders Sandberg, seems to do x-risk work less frequently than Nick and Stuart.)

Similarly, at SI we're always trying to find ways to spend money to "free up" Eliezer, since additional hours of x-risk work from Eliezer are also very hard to beat in terms of x-risk reduction purchased per dollar.

Comment author: drethelin 17 November 2012 12:57:16AM 1 point [-]

Is he still teaching a bayes class at minicamps?

Comment author: CarlShulman 17 November 2012 01:14:53AM 8 points [-]

I think he has now been replaced in that role. He is spending this week working intensively on one of the "FAI open problems" with a group of visitors every day, and there is a minicamp going on right now.