Decius comments on Voting is like donating thousands of dollars to charity - Less Wrong

32 Post author: Academian 05 November 2012 01:02AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (210)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Decius 05 November 2012 03:56:52AM 4 points [-]

How small does the chance have to be before it isn't a chance anymore?

Also, are you intending to research and vote only for the presidential election? Local offices have smaller budgets but also smaller margins...

Comment author: Strange7 06 November 2012 03:16:10AM 0 points [-]

"Less than one expected payoff per human lifetime" seems like a good threshold.

Comment author: Decius 06 November 2012 05:37:58AM 1 point [-]

So... there is no chance that you will be married if/when you die. There is also no chance that you will be single if/when you die. (Assuming that you will only 'die' once). There are many things that happen one or fewer times per human lifetime; the expected chance of them happening is less than once per human lifetime.

Comment author: Strange7 07 November 2012 02:57:24AM 0 points [-]

Most people stop attempting to acquire additional spouses after they find a good one, so the actual rate of success isn't reflective of the number of successes someone could statistically expect if they worked at it continuously for 100 years.

Comment author: Decius 08 November 2012 06:07:48AM 0 points [-]

Many people marry more than once in their lifetime; I'm not sure what the average is offhand- but I didn't reference marriages, I measured conditions at a specified point in lifespan.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 06 November 2012 04:52:18AM 0 points [-]

Of course, this is LW; local notions of how long a human lifetime is differ by many orders of magnitude.

Comment author: MugaSofer 06 November 2012 11:35:05AM 0 points [-]

How small does the chance have to be before it isn't a chance anymore?

Zero?

Comment author: Mark_Eichenlaub 05 November 2012 01:00:23PM 0 points [-]

Re: other stuff on ballot. Yes, that's right. I was just replying to the content of the post.

Sorry, I don't understand what was meant by your first sentence.

Comment author: Decius 05 November 2012 05:33:36PM 1 point [-]

Is a .001% chance of making a difference still a chance of making a difference? Is a seven-sigma chance still a chance?

Comment author: Mark_Eichenlaub 05 November 2012 06:00:54PM *  0 points [-]

All of them are obviously still chances. I never said that a very small probability wasn't a chance. I said that it might rationally be treated in a different manner than larger chances due to risk-aversion.

Comment author: RobinZ 05 November 2012 04:46:34AM 0 points [-]

Not to mention that, if he lives in Maryland, he has at least seven ballot questions to answer on the poll.