John_Maxwell_IV comments on Voting is like donating thousands of dollars to charity - Less Wrong

32 Post author: Academian 05 November 2012 01:02AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (210)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 05 November 2012 09:17:27AM *  0 points [-]

This seems backwards.

Yep, you read right, and yeah, it's nuts.

It also implies that Tom's state is going to end up with any messy industries that have to go somewhere, but that no voter wants in their back yard.

Congressional elections work much differently than presidential elections. My vague impression is that nuts-and-bolts level concerns like what industries go in what state are handled by Congress, not the president.

Comment author: TheSingularityIsOver 05 November 2012 08:42:36PM 1 point [-]

Congressional elections work much differently than presidential elections. My vague impression is that nuts-and-bolts level concerns like what industries go in what state are handled by Congress, not the president.

No, actually, the federal government doesn't do all that much to determine what industries go into which states. Mostly its private decision making. Businesses are generally free to locate their operations or management wherever they want to. Of course, some businesses, like gambling, are illegal in some localities or they can get more favorable treatment in certain locations rather than others, but typically the federal government doesn't make those decisions.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 05 November 2012 09:26:01PM 0 points [-]

Yep, I was being facetious.

Comment author: Nornagest 05 November 2012 08:50:10PM *  0 points [-]

While that's true in most cases, federal contracts can make a pretty big difference in some industries, particularly those connected with infrastructure or defense. (All those highway projects with signs saying "Funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act" form a recent and salient example.) This is a semi-adversarial process, since allocation of contracts is zero-sum and Congresscritters have incentives to funnel them to their own states or districts; "should" isn't the only concern and may not even be a primary one.

On the other hand, these incentives are tied more to regions than to parties, so choice of candidate isn't likely to make a big difference in how they're executed.