= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Furcas comments on If MWI is correct, should we expect to experience Quantum Torment? - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (69)
Sure, but the subjective experience of being my past self will never causally follow from my subjective experience of being the current me, so I don't care.
Put another way, you're talking about timeless immortality. I'm talking about real immortality.
The difference between "never" and "with order epsilon probability" is of order epsilon, I wouldn't worry your head about it.
And you're not talking about real immortality, that's my point. Quantum immortality is no more real than timeless immortality, and arguably less.
You're talking about a different notion of immortality. As it ignores probability, it doesn't seem to capture the usual concept very well.
For sure, whatever kind of "immortality" it is it certainly isn't something I would tend to describe as "real"!