= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Annoyance comments on Rationality in the Media: Don't (New Yorker, May 2009) - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (16)
If you're going to have an "in conclusion" at the end of your post, it would be nice if the post had a presented thesis that the rest of the material supports or at least is involved in analyzing.
I agree - I really liked the way this article was formatted, but perhaps it would make more sense if the "in conclusion" paragraph was part of the "criticism". Then you can just have a thesis for that section, with a relatively neutral summary and background literature.
On the other hand, perhaps it was supposed to be the lifehacking takeaway - in which case maybe another header was in order, and it should be opened with something other than "in conclusion".
Noted.