SoullessAutomaton comments on Survey Results - Less Wrong

48 Post author: Yvain 12 May 2009 10:09PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (210)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: SoullessAutomaton 13 May 2009 09:59:27PM *  2 points [-]

IMO most of the strong arguments for libertarianism (as a set of policies) are consequentialist ones by economists.

Do any of these economists have a consistently successful track record of prediction? Remember, this is a field where opinions of serious economists on the recent stimulus package ranged from "it won't have any effect" to "it will make things worse" to "it doesn't go far enough".

Economists talking about large-scale political structures should be assumed to lack credibility until proven otherwise via actual, consistent predictive results.

EDIT: Requesting clarification on why this comment was voted down to -2. Robin has posted repeatedly on many experts' allergies to predictions. Have I made a mistake in my conclusions here?

Comment author: ciphergoth 14 May 2009 07:57:02AM 1 point [-]

Listen to Robin Hanson discuss this phenomenon on EconTalk. Starts with half-hour monologue by presenter, but I find the presenter quite interesting too.

Comment author: taw 14 May 2009 02:58:52AM 7 points [-]

lesswrong is not completely there yet, but it's steadily heading toward reddit's "downvote to disagree". It's a natural consequence of reddit-style comment up/down-voting system, don't think about it too much.

Comment author: Z_M_Davis 14 May 2009 04:03:25AM 6 points [-]

Strongly disagree about "don't think about it too much," but upvoted for pointing out this important problem. Everyone: upvote for useful discourse, not agreement!

Comment author: taw 14 May 2009 12:37:13PM 1 point [-]

"don't think about it too much" as in "don't think about things you cannot affect". Unless you want to go and convince Eliezer to remove downvoting and leave only upvote and report links like on Hacker News.

This will leave more garbage in the comments of course, I think it's smaller problem than "downvote to disagree", but I have no strong evidence about it.

Comment author: SoullessAutomaton 14 May 2009 10:38:57AM 1 point [-]

Unless or until we get separate voting for "agreement" vs. "quality", as people have mentioned a few times.