AnnaSalamon comments on Survey Results - Less Wrong

48 Post author: Yvain 12 May 2009 10:09PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (210)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Z_M_Davis 14 May 2009 07:03:58PM *  4 points [-]

IQs (warning: self-reported numbers for notoriously hard-to-measure statistic)

Yeah, I'm extremely skeptical of the IQ data. Assuming a standard mean=100 SD=15 test (although at least one respondent says he took a test with SD=24), our reputed median is above the 0.003th percentile. I don't think any public blog is that elite.

ERRATUM: Oh, dear. I meant 99.7th percentile.

Comment author: AnnaSalamon 15 May 2009 03:56:53AM 4 points [-]

It doesn't strike me as all that implausible, given how many other indicators of quirkiness we have as a group (e.g., the 95-97% male, the 12% with PhDs (and 23% of members over 35 with PhDs), the portion with advanced math/compsci skill, etc.).

Comment author: Alicorn 15 May 2009 04:10:35AM 0 points [-]

Math is not my strong suit, but my arithmetic comes out differently on the PhD bit. Are you counting as PhDs the people who have "student" in the "degree status" field?

Comment author: AnnaSalamon 15 May 2009 06:20:34AM 1 point [-]

I was working off the 233 people who filled out my earlier survey. I haven't analyzed Yvain's data; what percentage do you get there?

Comment author: Alicorn 15 May 2009 03:05:06PM 0 points [-]

I didn't write it down and I don't want to count them up again, sorry.