army1987 comments on How minimal is our intelligence? - Less Wrong

55 Post author: Douglas_Reay 25 November 2012 11:34PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (214)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 20 November 2012 09:47:22AM 1 point [-]

Given that the neolithic revolution happened in more than one place, I don't see how it could be a very significant filter.

But it probably wouldn't have happened anywhere if there wasn't an interglacial period. My point is that intelligent life is unlikely to develop a technological civilization unless the planet they're on allows them to achieve very high population densities (e.g. by artificially growing more food than otherwise available), which ISTM that Earth before the interglacial period didn't.

Or are you referring to "civilization" in a sense not achieved by the Incans or the Aztecs?

From what I read on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aztec#Economy they definitely do count as a civilization by my standards.