Kaj_Sotala comments on [Proposed Paper] Predicting Machine Super Intelligence - Less Wrong

3 Post author: JaySwartz 20 November 2012 07:15AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (11)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 22 November 2012 07:48:39AM 3 points [-]

From the post:

If the community reacts positively (based on karma and comments) we'll support the potential contributors' effort to complete the paper

I don't think you should put very much weight on the reaction from LW, given that much more polished papers often get low karma. E.g. both my "Responses to Catastrophic AGI Risk: A Survey" and my and Stuart's "How We're Predicting AI — or Failing to" are currently at only 11 upvotes and rather few comments. If even finished papers get that little of a reaction, I would expect that even many drafts that genuinely deserved a great reception would get little to no response.

Comment author: JaySwartz 28 November 2012 07:51:45PM 0 points [-]

Kaj,

Thank you. I had noticed that as well. It seems the LW group is focused on a much longer time horizon.