Prismattic comments on A Parable On Obsolete Ideologies - Less Wrong

113 Post author: Yvain 13 May 2009 10:51PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (272)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: CaveJohnson 17 December 2011 11:44:41PM 3 points [-]

Assuming you want to filter applicants based on IQ, testing individuals seems vastly more helpful than assuming based on population mean, especially given that the demographics of applicants will not be the same as the total population.

The problem is you can't use IQ tests. You see IQ tests are clearly racist and insidiously so since culturally loaded sub-tests like vocabulary seem to actually show smaller ethnic differences.

No matter. We'll find out how the tests are racist some day!

Comment author: Prismattic 18 December 2011 07:54:40AM *  1 point [-]

Your mockery, at least as concerns standardized testing in general, is misplaced

A good item was not one that discriminated between ignorance and knowledge, but one that discriminated between good students and poor students. Therefore, if everybody selected the same distractor, good and poor students alike, the item was discarded, even if it was important stuff to know, even if it was right. And no matter how important, if the good students didn't get the right answer, the item was thrown out.

That is in reference to a firm that produces standardized tests deciding to abandon a particular question because inner city kids did better on it than suburban kids did.

Comment author: CaveJohnson 18 December 2011 09:05:00AM *  0 points [-]

I'm talking about IQ tests constructed by academics not firms.