lukeprog comments on Overconfident Pessimism - Less Wrong

25 Post author: lukeprog 24 November 2012 12:47AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (38)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: lukeprog 24 November 2012 01:21:00AM 3 points [-]

This really is picking and choosing specific technological examples rather than looking at the overall pattern. In 1964, five years before the first moon landing, it looked a few years off but certainly not a hundred years off.

I don't think Eliezer meant to say that breakthrough technologies always seem 50 years off or impossible until they are invented. Those who were paying attention to computer chess could predict it passing the human level before the end of the millenium, and we've seen self-driving cars coming for a while now. Anyway, I've added a clarifying note below the Eliezer quote, now.

Comment author: [deleted] 24 November 2012 04:24:58PM 7 points [-]

I don't think Eliezer meant to say that breakthrough technologies always seem 50 years off or impossible until they are invented.

I don't think JoshuaZ meant to say Eliezer meant to say that. It seems more like he just meant that the list feels cherry-picked; that the examples given seem to be chosen for their suitability to the argument rather than because they form a compelling signal when compared against other relevant data points.