DanArmak comments on LW Women: LW Online - Less Wrong

29 [deleted] 15 February 2013 01:43AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (590)

Sort By: Popular

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: DanArmak 15 February 2013 01:55:55PM 27 points [-]

We already rarely discuss politics, so would it be terrible to also discuss sex/gender issues as little as possible?

Discussing politics is not productive. The political opinions held by most people don't affect actual politics. Discussing politics would be a waste of time even if it wasn't mindkilling. I make a point of never reading local political news and not knowing anything about my country's politics, as a matter of epistemical hygiene.

Gender relations and understanding, on the other hand, are important in everyone's lives. I can't ignore gender like I do politics, and I wouldn't want to. On the contrary, I want to become rational and virtuous about gender.

So I very much want to have discussions about gender, unless the consensus is that our rationality is too weak and we can't discuss this subject without causing net harm (or net harm to women, etc).

Comment author: h-H 18 February 2013 06:59:59AM 3 points [-]

Gender relations = politics.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 18 February 2013 08:40:12AM 4 points [-]

This seems like the noncentral fallacy.