Randy_M comments on LW Women Submissions: On Misogyny - Less Wrong

27 [deleted] 10 April 2013 07:54PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (472)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Randy_M 15 April 2013 03:18:20PM 2 points [-]

Hmm, 6 orders of magnitude. If you are limiting fatherhood to conception that would be about 5 minutes for the man; times 1,000,000 then, 5,000,000 for the woman equals 3472 days, or 9.5 years. Not a bad approximation, except that that obviously isn't the absolute minimum the woman could invest, as she could give it up for adoption after birth, or about 432,000 minutes, only 5 orders of magnitude larger than the father.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 15 April 2013 04:06:16PM 0 points [-]

Shouldn't you be including recovery time in that minimum?

Also, why focus on the minimum rather than the typical in practice or father's investment which is most likely to lead to grandchildren?

Comment author: [deleted] 16 April 2013 06:18:01PM *  2 points [-]

Shouldn't you be including recovery time in that minimum?

Then you should also exclude the first few months, when (from what I've seen) aren't that bad.

Also, why focus on the minimum rather than the typical in practice

Because that's what my awesomeness-o-meter (which is what started this subthread) seems to respond to, especially given that Pragmatist put it in terms of sperm.

Comment author: Randy_M 15 April 2013 04:29:48PM 1 point [-]

Let's call it 4*10^5 minutes, then. My response was to what is 'minimal obligatory'--assuming the obligation is placed by biology, rather than law or honor or reason. Over a lifetime of care, the differences vary more by couple than gender, I'd expect.

Comment author: [deleted] 15 April 2013 03:26:21PM *  0 points [-]

I had pulled a figure out of my ass, and then divided the normal duration of a pregnancy by it to see whether the result was reasonable, but I must have goofed with the maths because I had got 23 minutes.ยน (Fixed.)


  1. Yes, a man can take shorter than that to just ejaculate, but then again it's not like pregnancy completely prevents you from working throughout its duration.
Comment author: Randy_M 15 April 2013 03:34:27PM 1 point [-]

I actually had no idea how it would end up before I did the math. You must have read the Fermi post*.

*(Not to imply you couldn't have read about it beforehand; just a figure of speech)

Comment author: [deleted] 15 April 2013 03:44:16PM *  0 points [-]

I have, but IIRC I hadn't when I wrote that comment.