TheOtherDave comments on LW Women Entries- Creepiness - Less Wrong

7 [deleted] 28 April 2013 03:43PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (472)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 29 April 2013 08:37:03PM 6 points [-]

I would characterize the condition you describe as being interested in people. (It applies to me as well.)

Kawoomba's hypothetical posits that "you" aren't interested in people, merely in computer games, programming and rationality forums.

Comment author: pragmatist 05 May 2013 05:33:17AM *  2 points [-]

Fair enough, but if this hypothetical character is not interested in people at all, I don't see why he cares about the gender distribution of people who share his interests. The implication seems to be that this person is interested in social contact, and uses his other interests as a filter to decide who he spends time with. My suggestion was that the desire for social contact might be more effectively satisfied if the person trained himself to be able to talk about (and at least temporarily be interested in learning about) things that he isn't immediately interested in.

I wouldn't characterize myself as merely being interested in people, incidentally, because my desire to converse with other people about their interests isn't indiscriminate. I doubt I could sustain an interesting conversation with someone who is really into the life and work of Kim Kardashian, for instance.

Comment author: savageorange 02 May 2013 07:00:25AM 0 points [-]

I was hoping your reply was the 'more pointed summary' I intended to post, but since it's not:

.. Being interested in how people work and universal human experiences.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 02 May 2013 03:00:54PM 1 point [-]

I don't follow what you meant to express here.

Comment author: savageorange 02 May 2013 11:29:28PM 1 point [-]

You wrote

I would characterize the condition you describe as being interested in people.

I originally intended to post something similar but more pointed. Since your post didn't quite attain the suitable level of pointedness, I replied to your post instead of the original.

That is, I originally intended to post something like (combining the wording of your and my posts):

I'd characterize that condition as being interested in how people work and universal human experience.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 03 May 2013 02:52:03AM 1 point [-]

Ah, I see. Thanks for the clarification.