RomeoStevens comments on Replaceability as a virtue - Less Wrong

5 Post author: chaosmage 12 December 2012 07:53AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (41)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: RomeoStevens 11 December 2012 03:55:49AM 0 points [-]

What if by making myself irreplaceable I maximize my income and donate more money to x-risk reduction? I don't buy the concept of altruism towards people who don't care about x-risk.

Comment author: Swimmer963 12 December 2012 03:19:53AM 0 points [-]

I don't buy the concept of altruism towards people who don't care about x-risk.

Can you clarify what you mean by this?

Comment author: RomeoStevens 12 December 2012 03:48:09AM 0 points [-]

On reflection I think I misused the word altruism. I'm an egoist, but my actions towards others may seem altruistic in cases where those others are optimizing for futures I prefer. For example, Aubrey de Grey is better at optimizing for a future in which I don't die than I am, so I prefer to give him some of my optimization power.

Comment author: Swimmer963 12 December 2012 12:58:16PM 0 points [-]

OK, so what you're trying to say is "I, personally, act 'altruistic' towards people who are working on x-risk, and don't buy the concept of being 'altruistic' towards anyone else." Is that right? I was reading it as "a given person's behaviour can't be called altruistic unless they are working on x-risk."

Comment author: RomeoStevens 12 December 2012 07:18:51PM 0 points [-]

Yes.