TraderJoe comments on Replaceability as a virtue - Less Wrong

5 Post author: chaosmage 12 December 2012 07:53AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (41)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: TraderJoe 11 December 2012 04:07:31PM 5 points [-]

"The graveyards are full of indispensable men" - De Gaulle.

Comment author: wedrifid 11 December 2012 08:10:30PM 17 points [-]

"The graveyards are full of indispensable men" - De Gaulle.

History is full of collapsed empires, failed projects and lost battles. The loss of an indispensable person does not itself prove they were not indispensable. It may just mean you're screwed.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 12 December 2012 04:59:42AM 9 points [-]

I interpret the quote as meaning somewhat that people kid themselves about how irreplaceable they are.

Comment author: Swimmer963 12 December 2012 03:15:57AM 1 point [-]

"The graveyards are full of indispensable men" - De Gaulle.

The graveyards are full of everyone who has ever lived up until ~1850 (and a lot of people born after that).

Comment author: gwern 12 December 2012 03:27:30AM 1 point [-]

I kind of assumed that was the anonymous author's point. (I've seen it attributed to many different French.)

Comment author: Swimmer963 12 December 2012 03:44:57AM 3 points [-]

It may have been the original author's point, but that makes it kind of a non sequitur comment to this post, at least to my first reading of it. Yes, indispensable people die. People who try to make themselves replaceable also die. The people left behind are better off if the deceased is "more replaceable" in at least a practical sense.

...On further thought, I think I automatically interpreted the comment as disagreeing with the article, because my brain seems to assume that most one-like comments are going to be disagreements. If I interpret it as agreeing with the article, then it makes perfect sense.