Peterdjones comments on 2012 Survey Results - Less Wrong

80 Post author: Yvain 07 December 2012 09:04PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (640)
Tags: survey meta community

Comments (640)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Peterdjones 09 January 2013 06:32:46PM *  -1 points [-]

I am not going to give a full response, because your comments are obstreporous, but See RichardKennaway's discussion for LW's oeverarching hopes for Bayes, and its limitations

What's the point of indicating when it's not being misused?

You have your opinion, on that, I have mine. You can state your opinion, I can't state mine. I can't discuss the censorship, because discussions of censorship are censored.

Comment author: gwern 09 January 2013 06:34:11PM 0 points [-]

You're stating it right now. Oh the ironing.

Comment author: Peterdjones 09 January 2013 06:38:13PM *  -1 points [-]

It's in a downvoted thread.So it isn't visible.If negative karma doesn't do anything regarding the visibility of comments, why have the button? Sheesh.

Comment author: gwern 09 January 2013 06:42:25PM 1 point [-]

It's in a downvoted thread.So it isn't visible.

And so begins the equivocation on 'people have to click a button to see it' with 'censorship'.

Comment author: Peterdjones 09 January 2013 06:45:49PM -1 points [-]

And so I ask you a second time: what is the button for?

Comment author: gwern 09 January 2013 06:50:26PM *  1 point [-]

And so begins another goal-shifting, like the list or like the claim of 'censorship', this time to defining karma systems. Pardon me if I don't care to continue this game.

Comment author: Peterdjones 09 January 2013 07:00:44PM *  -2 points [-]

OK. You cannot give an answer that will not embarass yourself. Got that.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit