gattsuru comments on Rationality Quotes December 2012 - Less Wrong

4 Post author: Thomas 03 December 2012 02:33AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (226)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: gattsuru 03 December 2012 11:44:09PM -1 points [-]

It turns out that facts, when viewed as a large body of knowledge, are just as predictable. Facts, in the aggregate, have half-lives: we can measure the amount of time for half of a subject's knowledge to be overturned.


Samuel Abesman, The Half-Life of Facts: Why Everything We Know Has an Expiration Date.

Comment author: roystgnr 06 December 2012 09:49:46PM 8 points [-]

Radioactive atoms, in the aggregate, don't have a half-life. If you measure the nuclear radiation coming from a heterogenous glob of radioactive material, and it takes N hours to drop to 50% of that level, then it will take more than N hours to drop to 25% of the original level. The original material had both shorter-lived substances with a half-life of less than N hours and longer-lived substances with a half-life of more than N hours (and possibly non-radioactive elements as well), and since the former materials decay faster than the latter, the ratio between them falls until the latter materials dominate.

I suspect the same process holds true for facts.

Comment author: DSimon 04 December 2012 07:27:55PM 4 points [-]

Facts, in the aggregate, have half-lives: we can measure the amount of time for half of a subject's knowledge to be overturned.

The tricky part there is figuring out which half.

Comment author: Mass_Driver 07 December 2012 02:13:15AM 3 points [-]

Also, this book was a horrible agglomeration of irrelevant and un-analyzed factoids. If you've already read any two Malcolm Gladwell books or Freakonomics, It'd be considerably more educational to skip this book and just read the cards in a Trivial Pursuit box.