RichardKennaway comments on Train Philosophers with Pearl and Kahneman, not Plato and Kant - Less Wrong

65 Post author: lukeprog 06 December 2012 12:42AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (510)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 04 December 2012 01:07:58PM 3 points [-]

I presume lukeprog wouldn't have a problem with a paper proposing an fMRI comparison study of atheist/theist Bach listeners.

I hope lukeprog would not give a paper credence just because it did sciencey stuff and maths. There is, after all, the famous dead fish study which, as it happens, used fMRI. We have already learned that there is a lot of junk science in medicine and in nutrition. So also in neuroscience.

Luke, how does the Dolan & Sharot book measure up by the standards of science as it should be done?

Comment author: [deleted] 04 December 2012 01:31:26PM 0 points [-]

I hope lukeprog would not give a paper credence just because it did sciencey stuff and maths.

I was not suggesting anything of the sort. Azari's work on religious experience is not junk science, as far as I'm aware.