= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
DanArmak comments on Mixed Reference: The Great Reductionist Project - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (353)
That doesn't mean you don't talk about energy as a basic ontological kind. You still have to talk about it - to say that its value happens to be zero.
Whether it is actually zero, is an empirical matter. I haven't heard of physical theories that claim this, so what do you mean exactly?