Peterdjones comments on Mixed Reference: The Great Reductionist Project - Less Wrong

29 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 05 December 2012 12:26AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (353)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Peterdjones 27 December 2012 11:05:15AM 1 point [-]

Searle's views have nothing to do with attributing novel properties to fundamental particles. They are more to do with identifying mental properties with higher-levle physical properties, which are themselves irreducible in a sense (but also reducible in another sense).

Comment author: Ritalin 29 December 2012 08:08:31AM -1 points [-]

That's confusing. What senses?

Comment author: Peterdjones 01 January 2013 11:35:39AM 0 points [-]

See the link I gave to start with.