kodos96 comments on By Which It May Be Judged - Less Wrong

35 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 10 December 2012 04:26AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (934)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: kodos96 20 December 2012 05:59:39AM *  0 points [-]

Thought experiment: suppose I were to tell you that every time I see you write out "G-d", I responded by writing "God", or perhaps even "YHWH", on a piece of paper, 10 times. Would that knowledge alter your behavior? How about if I instead (or additionally) spoke it aloud?

Edit: downvote explanation requested.

Comment author: MixedNuts 20 December 2012 09:54:12AM 2 points [-]

It feels exactly equivalent to telling me that every time you see me turn down licorice, you'll eat ten wheels of it. It would bother me slightly if you normally avoided taking the Name in vain (and you didn't, like, consider it a sacred duty to annoy me), but not to the point I'd change my behavior.

Which I didn't know, but makes sense in hindsight (as hindsight is wont to do); sacredness is a hobby, and I might be miffed at fellow enthusiasts Doing It Wrong, but not at people who prefer fishing or something.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 21 December 2012 03:27:59AM 1 point [-]

1) I don't believe you.

2) I don't respond to blackmail.

Comment author: wedrifid 21 December 2012 05:38:55AM 2 points [-]

My usual response to reading 2) is to think 1).

I wonder if you really wouldn't respond to blackmail if the stakes were high and you'd actually lose something critical. "I don't respond to blackmail" usually means "I claim social dominance in this conflict".

Comment author: kodos96 21 December 2012 05:52:34AM 2 points [-]

Not in general, but in this particular instance, the error is in seeing any "conflict" whatsoever. This was not intended as a challenge, or a dick-waving contest, just a sincerely proposed thought experiment in order to help me better understand MixedNuts' mental model.

Comment author: wedrifid 21 December 2012 07:04:26AM *  2 points [-]

Not in general, but in this particular instance, the error is in seeing any "conflict" whatsoever. This was not intended as a challenge, or a dick-waving contest, just a sincerely proposed thought experiment in order to help me better understand MixedNuts' mental model.

(My response was intended to be within the thought experiment mode, not external. I took Eugine's as being within that mode too.)

Comment author: kodos96 21 December 2012 07:29:14AM 0 points [-]

Thanks, I apppreciate that. My pique was in response to Eugine's downvote, not his comment.

Comment author: [deleted] 22 December 2012 01:59:42AM 0 points [-]

I wonder if you really wouldn't respond to blackmail if the stakes were high and you'd actually lose something critical.

“In practice, virtually everyone seems to judge a large matter of principle to be more important than a small one of pragmatics, and vice versa — everyone except philosophers, that is.” (Gary Drescher, Good and Real)

Comment author: kodos96 21 December 2012 05:47:36AM 1 point [-]

What???!!! Are you suggesting that I'm actually planning on conducting the proposed thought experiment? Actually, physically, getting a piece of paper and writing out the words in question? I assure you, this is not the case. I don't even have any blank paper in my home - this is the 21st century after all.

This is a thought experiment I'm proposing, in order to help me better understand MixedNuts' mental model. No different from proposing a thought experiment involving dust motes and eternal torture. Are you saying that Eliezer should be punished for considering such hypothetical situations, a trillion times over?

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 22 December 2012 07:16:57AM *  2 points [-]

What???!!! Are you suggesting that I'm actually planning on conducting the proposed thought experiment? Actually, physically, getting a piece of paper and writing out the words in question? I assure you, this is not the case. I don't even have any blank paper in my home - this is the 21st century after all.

Yes I know, and my comment was how I would respond in your thought experiment.

(Edited: the first version accidentally implied the opposite of what I intended.)

Comment author: kodos96 22 December 2012 07:45:52AM 0 points [-]

??? Ok, skipping over the bizarre irrationality of your making that assumption in the first place, now that I've clarified the situation and told you in no uncertain terms that I am NOT planning on conducting such an experiment (other than inside my head), are you saying you think I'm lying? You sincerely believe that I literally have a pen and paper in front of me, and I'm going through MixedNuts's comment history and writing out sacred names for each occurance of "G-d"? Do you actually believe that? Or are you pulling our collective leg?

In the event that you do actually believe that, what kind of evidence might I provide that would change your mind? Or is this an unfalsifiable belief?

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 22 December 2012 07:56:14AM 1 point [-]

Oops. See my edit.

Comment author: shminux 21 December 2012 06:41:27AM 1 point [-]

Why should s/he care about what you choose to do?

Comment author: kodos96 21 December 2012 06:42:54AM 2 points [-]

I don't know. That's why I asked.

Comment author: Decius 20 December 2012 06:07:08AM 0 points [-]

Isn't blackmail a little extreme?

Comment author: kodos96 20 December 2012 06:55:31AM *  1 point [-]

Yes, which is why I explicitly labled it as only a thought experiment.

This seems to me to be entirely in keeping with the LW tradition of thought experiments regarding dust particles and eternal torture.... by posing such a question, you're not actually threatening to torture anybody.

Edit: downvote explantion requested.

Comment author: Decius 20 December 2012 03:54:13PM 0 points [-]

Or put a dost mote in everybody's eye.

Withdrawn.