TrE comments on Singularity the hard way - Less Wrong

-11 Post author: CCC 12 December 2012 07:07PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (30)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: TrE 12 December 2012 07:47:50PM *  3 points [-]

Considering that every new human more or less starts off as a blank slate (or rather, that which we do start with doesn't improve with each generation) and there is only so much a human can learn within a lifetime (unless we consider genetic engineering or control over death/prolonging life), I'd expect that progress becomes slower and slower over time. I don't see how a takeoff (where progress speeds up again, and drastically so) could be achieved without either mind uploads, anti-death measures which greatly prolong life, or genetic engineering/breeding of humans. Or major breakthroughs in education, to the point where you don't need brains to observe and pattern-match, but can teach them directly.

A data point: Even today, in highly explored areas such as mathematics, it takes a significant fraction of a normal human life to acquire the skillset needed to tackle the hard problems.

Comment author: CCC 13 December 2012 03:38:23AM 0 points [-]

Ancillary devices (like computers) do improve, however. With time, education will likely shift away from memorising facts, and people will put a greater reliance on handheld computing systems; which can include, for example, automated theorem proving software (which already exists).

Brain-computer direct interfaces will take time to develop, but are a continuation of this trend.