Daniel_Lewis comments on Supernatural Math - Less Wrong

1 Post author: saturn 19 May 2009 11:31AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (56)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Daniel_Lewis 19 May 2009 07:37:04PM *  3 points [-]

You're right. PA is still consistent (i.e. has a model) even if

 N = the set of strings of the form S*0
0 = the string "0"
S = the function that prepends "S" to its argument

fails to be one because of the way string concatenation works. There's nothing mathematically special about theories that can use physical objects as a model.

(Minor quibble: the definition of addition isn't an axiom. It's just a relation definable in the first-order theory of arithmetic.)