thomblake comments on Supernatural Math - Less Wrong

1 Post author: saturn 19 May 2009 11:31AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (56)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: thomblake 20 May 2009 06:26:45PM *  0 points [-]

I see what I was doing here. The law of excluded middle is equivalent to the law of non-contradiction. Probably why I had the two confused. Example in sentential logic:

  1. ¬(p∧¬p) (law of non-contradiction)
  2. ¬p∨¬¬p | 1, de morgan's
  3. ¬p∨p | 2, double negation
  4. p∨¬p | 3, commutation (law of excluded middle)