Louie comments on Bounding the impact of AGI - Less Wrong

17 Post author: Louie 18 December 2012 07:47PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (13)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Louie 19 December 2012 02:55:53AM 0 points [-]

Martel (1997) estimates a considerably higher annualized death rate of 3,500 from meteorite impacts alone (she doesn’t consider continental drift or gamma-ray bursts), but the internal logic of safety engineering demands we seek a lower bound, one that we must put up with no matter what strides we make in redistribution of food, global peace, or healthcare.

Is this correct? I'd expect that this lower-bound was superior to the above (10 deaths / year) for the purpose of calculating our present safety factor... unless we're currently able to destroy earth-threatening meteorites and no one told me.

Comment author: DaFranker 19 December 2012 05:41:59PM *  1 point [-]

unless we're currently able to destroy earth-threatening meteorites and no one told me.

Well, we do have the technological means to build something to counter one of them, if we were to learn about it tomorrow and it had ETA 2-3 years. Assuming the threat is taken seriously and more resources and effort are put into this than they were / are in killing militant toddlers in the middle-east using drones, that is.

But if one shows up now and it's about to hit Earth on the prophecy-filled turn of the Mayan calendar? Nope, GG.