Oligopsony comments on Standard and Nonstandard Numbers - Less Wrong

31 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 20 December 2012 03:23AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (83)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Oligopsony 20 December 2012 04:26:05AM 1 point [-]

Not at the same time, I hope.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 20 December 2012 04:27:45AM 10 points [-]

Every time you take box A and box B from Omega, Omicron tortures a kitten.

Comment author: [deleted] 21 December 2012 07:06:46PM *  6 points [-]

It was once thought that adoring cats caused one to get tortured. However, a recent medical study has come out, showing that most cat adorers have a certain gene, ACGT, and that whether someone has the gene or not, their chances of getting tortured go down if they adore cats. The strong correlation between adoring cats and getting tortured is because of a third factor, ACGT, that leads to both.

Having learned of this new study, would you choose to adore cats?

Comment author: ciphergoth 22 December 2012 02:09:58PM *  9 points [-]

Or, indeed, should I choose not to adore cats because it might be evidence I had toxoplasmosis?

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 22 December 2012 10:57:35PM 7 points [-]

Actually, that toxoplasmosis thing is the only happiness-creating-preference-inducing, negative-side-effect disease I actually know that really works for Solomon's Problem. You can either pet cute kittens already tested and guaranteed not to have toxoplasmosis, or refrain. This ought to be our go-to real-life example against EDT!

Comment author: Alex_Altair 19 April 2013 05:05:50PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: [deleted] 22 December 2012 01:56:49AM 3 points [-]

You guys deliberately chose examples so that acronyms are entirely made up of letters also used for nucleotides, didn't you?

Comment author: [deleted] 21 December 2012 07:23:00PM 0 points [-]

I don't think I have a choice really, I already do adore cats. Is that an actual study btw? If it is, I'm gonna cheat by getting a scientist to scan my dna and tell me if I have it.

Comment author: arundelo 22 December 2012 03:32:17AM 0 points [-]

Is that an actual study btw?

Probably not.

Comment author: wedrifid 21 December 2012 09:56:37PM 0 points [-]

I don't think I have a choice really, I already do adore cats.

Then you are mistaken about human psychology. You definitely have a choice about whether you will adore cats, it is simply one that requires action.

Comment author: homunq 20 December 2012 05:35:55AM *  3 points [-]

I hope you don't imagine it's an innocent kitten, though. Because even hypothetically speaking, it's not. Eet ees an evil keeten.

Comment author: Benito 20 December 2012 06:06:28PM 1 point [-]

Actually, whenever you two-box, my friend Clive puts his cat Omicron into Box A.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSKlYFfhBhY

Yes, he has a cat called Omicron, and he does normally go around with axioms of set theory on his t-shirt.