army1987 comments on Against NHST - Less Wrong

57 Post author: gwern 21 December 2012 04:45AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (62)
Tags: psychology statistics frequentism

Comments (62)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 22 December 2012 02:32:19AM 0 points [-]

If non-NHST frequentism

That'd be essentially Bayesianism with the (uninformative improper) priors (uniform for location parameters and logarithms of scale parameters) swept under the rug, right?

Comment author: jsteinhardt 25 December 2012 02:04:12AM 1 point [-]

Not at all (I wrote a post refuting this a couple months ago but can't link it from my phone)

Comment author: gwern 25 December 2012 10:16:52PM 4 points [-]

http://lesswrong.com/lw/f7t/beyond_bayesians_and_frequentists/ I presume.

Comment author: jsteinhardt 26 December 2012 06:10:43AM 2 points [-]

Thanks!

Comment author: gwern 22 December 2012 03:51:43AM 1 point [-]

I really couldn't presume to say.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit