tgb comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 18, chapter 87 - Less Wrong

4 Post author: Alsadius 22 December 2012 07:55AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (592)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Xachariah 22 December 2012 01:12:23PM *  8 points [-]

The referenced work by Andrew Critch on hedonic awareness is not yet published science. It’s his private work that he developed at the University of Berkeley for a course on psychology for mathematicians; brought to the Center for Applied Rationality; and then developed into a CFAR workshop unit.

Dang it. I was trying looking him up until I saw the Author's Note.

For anyone who has taken the workshop or is otherwise familiar with his work (or similar work), could you provide a summary? I'm sure it's more complicated than portrayed here, but is keeping a bag of chocolates with you and rewarding yourself like you were training a pidgeon a decent start? I'd love to try it out.

Comment author: tgb 23 December 2012 03:45:10AM 2 points [-]

I've wondered before whether Eliezer would use science from after 1992 that Harry couldn't have read. Now I need wonder no longer.

Comment author: Alsadius 23 December 2012 05:26:17AM 7 points [-]

Brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "timeless physics".

(Yes, I'm aware that this joke would have been funnier if it was a physics paper)

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 23 December 2012 07:03:26AM 5 points [-]

Actually timeless physics is being treated as Timeless Science in HPMOR - nobody in 1991 should've heard of Julian Barbour yet.

Comment author: Karl 23 December 2012 09:44:09PM 3 points [-]
Comment author: Alsadius 23 December 2012 07:19:20AM 1 point [-]

Ah! I knew there was a funny joke in there somewhere.

Comment author: DanArmak 23 December 2012 04:47:08PM 2 points [-]

While the actual physics has Time-Turners.

Comment author: FiftyTwo 23 December 2012 09:58:39AM 2 points [-]

Twist, Harry's Dark side is actually an embedded copy of a modern day wikipedia?

Comment author: wedrifid 23 December 2012 01:26:28PM 6 points [-]

Twist, Harry's Dark side is actually an embedded copy of a modern day wikipedia?

Test: Watch Harry closely to see if he starts randomly deleting parts of himself!

Comment author: DanArmak 23 December 2012 04:53:13PM 5 points [-]

Inner Slytherin: Quirrel can't be David Monroe, because I asked him about the class of 1943 and he didn't know the teachers' names!

Inner Ravenclaw: [No original research]

Inner Hufflepuff: [Request for Speedy Deletion]

Comment author: Alsadius 23 December 2012 06:30:38PM 7 points [-]

Oh please, like a Ravenclaw would be offended by original research.