This also seems like an excessively hostile way of disagreeing!

It is unfortunate that the one word on your comment that you gave emphasis to is the one word that invalidates it (rather than being a mere subjective disagreement). Since I have already been quite clear that I consider fubarobfusco's comment to be both epistemically flawed and an unacceptable violation of lesswrong's (or at very least my) ideals you ought to be able to predict that this would make me dismiss you as merely supporting toxic behavior. It means that the full weight of the grandparent comment applies to you, with additional emphasis given that you are persisting despite the redundant explanation.

Sorry

Wedrifid writing 'Sorry' in response to fubarobfusco's behavior---or anything else involving untenable misrepresentations of the words of another---would have been disingenuous. Moreover anyone who is remotely familiar with wedrifid would interpret him making that particular political move in that context as passive-aggressive dissembling... and would have been entirely correct in doing so.