Khoth comments on Donation tradeoffs in conscientious objection - Less Wrong

0 Post author: p4wnc6 27 December 2012 05:23PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (52)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Khoth 27 December 2012 10:22:10PM 0 points [-]

If LW discussion isn't the right place for doing that, I don't know where else on earth is.

Somewhere where there's no risk of the draft board googling it, that's where.

Comment author: handoflixue 28 December 2012 09:35:27PM 5 points [-]

p(Draft Board is even AWARE of p4wnc6 really being John Smith) TIMES p(Draft Board even bothering with Google) TIMES p(LessWrong is a top result) TIMES p(An old thread is high on Google) AND/OR p(They spend time going through all their old threads)

So, um... seriously? You consider that compound possibility MORE LIKELY than LessWrong producing useful draft-dodging advice? I can't help but think that would be strong evidence that LessWrong is bloody useless at problem solving, if it were true.

Comment author: p4wnc6 28 December 2012 11:49:47PM 1 point [-]

I allude to this point and get -3 votes. I appreciate this point. There are many good criticisms of what I've written. But this idea that I should be worried about an "internet trail" about it is not one of them.

Comment author: p4wnc6 27 December 2012 10:42:37PM *  -1 points [-]

That's ridiculous. I have no problem if the draft board Googles this thread. Maybe I'm a poor writer, but I think even a cursory reading of this thread reveals that (a) I am arguing from a position of sincere belief in conscientious objection, and (b) there's a difference between making an argument for conscientious objection and asking questions about behavior that will be correlated to desired outcomes conditional upon sincere belief in conscientious objection. It seems you are unwilling to examine a distinction between the two, or at least you are unwilling to speak here as if there's a distinction between the two or perhaps you think that it is impossible for draft boards to believe there is such a distinction.

And you assign a far higher prior probability to the event that this thread would negatively reflect on me if seen by a draft board than I do.