palladias comments on Donation tradeoffs in conscientious objection - Less Wrong

0 Post author: p4wnc6 27 December 2012 05:23PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (52)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Khoth 27 December 2012 08:32:26PM 15 points [-]

Well, one way to boost your chances of convincing people that you're a serious conscientious objector would be avoid leaving an internet trail that suggests your main reason for wanting to avoid conscription is concern for your personal safety.

Comment author: p4wnc6 27 December 2012 09:08:14PM 1 point [-]

How on earth are you getting that message from this thread? My whole intention with the thread is to say that I sincerely believe in opposing war, and wish to better understand the most effective ways to communicate that. I don't see anything in this thread to suggest that the reason I want to avoid conscription is concern for personal safety, other than mentioning Prob(death or serious injury | conscription) and I mention that here precisely because I would expect LWers to not view that as a retreat from separate ethical commitments to a position.

I find your reaction upsetting, either because you're only taking things at the surface level and disregarding what I'm actually saying, or else because I've written it up so poorly that I am not communicating my position at all. In any case, it's a shock to my prior that someone finds this post worthy of a downvote.

Comment author: palladias 27 December 2012 10:57:41PM 5 points [-]

Corroboration of Khoth: I also assumed this was a how-to-fake-Pacifism ask.

Both pacifists and fake!pacifists are interested in efficient signalling to a draft board.

Comment author: p4wnc6 27 December 2012 10:58:55PM -2 points [-]

Both pacifists and fake!pacifists are interested in efficient signalling to a draft board.

I don't see how this is relevant without additional information.