Qiaochu_Yuan comments on The Zeroth Skillset - Less Wrong

48 Post author: katydee 30 January 2013 12:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (108)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Qiaochu_Yuan 30 January 2013 07:21:33PM *  2 points [-]

Taboo "processing." There are at least two things you or katydee could mean by this, one of which is processing using System I, and one of which is processing using System II. The former seems extremely valuable to train with respect to the kind of information System I should be good at processing, e.g. fast-moving dangerous things, the body language and facial tics of other humans, etc.

Comment author: Eneasz 30 January 2013 08:41:07PM 1 point [-]

On a tangent, the terms "System I" and "System II" do not signal anything in their naming. Something a bit more descriptive would be nice. Like "Twitch System" and "Chess System", or really just about anything that invokes some imagery.

Comment author: syllogism 30 January 2013 09:33:58PM 3 points [-]

I could be wrong but I think that was regarded as a feature not a bug when they were named. The authors didn't want them to become little homunculi with personalities that gradually built through folk lore. I think given the way the popular scientific press operates I think this was actually very prescient. Just think how the idea of your "reptile brain" has entered the popular consciousness...

Comment author: dhoe 31 January 2013 09:11:51AM 0 points [-]

Are you attributing dual process theory to CFAR? In any case, situational awareness is not rationality, nor is it indispensable for it. I don't argue that it's nice to have, as are many other things, although I'd worry about trade-offs.

Comment author: Qiaochu_Yuan 31 January 2013 09:24:18AM 0 points [-]

I wasn't aware it was called that or pretty much anything about its history until just now. I'll edit.