Patrick comments on You can't signal to rubes - Less Wrong

7 Post author: Patrick 01 January 2013 06:40AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (115)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Patrick 01 January 2013 09:15:45AM 0 points [-]

Now that you mention it, I think this does occur, although I think most of the judgement is directed at the 'signaller' (or in my language 'panderer') for being vain or duplicitous, although I don't like saying I'm offended by it ("Offense is a sign of a weak and bourgeois mind" says my inner Dali.)

I think that 'pandering' does carry the connotations of how 'signalling' is used, but I'm happy to accept alternatives. One I can think of right away is "appealing to", and I'd be happy to switch from 'pandering' to 'appealing' if you like.

Comment author: fiddlemath 02 January 2013 05:15:44AM 0 points [-]

"Influencing" is pretty neutral, if not very specific. "Exploiting the halo effect" is too long, but precise.