Vaniver comments on You can't signal to rubes - Less Wrong

7 Post author: Patrick 01 January 2013 06:40AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (115)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Vaniver 01 January 2013 04:57:52PM 11 points [-]

A good way of remembering this criterion is the slogan "You can't signal to rubes."

This doesn't seem like it describes your fourth criterion; it reads more like "Rubes can't signal."

I do think that the claim "you can't signal to rubes" is a good one to keep in mind, but like Psychohistorian points out, that limits you to a narrow component of signalling, which I might characterize as spending resources on authority, which is only worthwhile if the audience can recognize authority. If a moviemaker decides to actually use an Bald Eagle cry instead of a Red-tailed Hawk cry, most movie-goers will think (TVTropes link) they got it wrong, and only ornithologists will notice it's correct.

Comment author: Patrick 02 January 2013 05:15:02AM 1 point [-]

A rube is a sucker, someone easily deceived.The slogan means that potential signalling explanations shouldn't assume that the receiver of the signals is stupid.