Peterdjones comments on You can't signal to rubes - Less Wrong

7 Post author: Patrick 01 January 2013 06:40AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (115)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Peterdjones 01 January 2013 06:15:10PM 5 points [-]

To me, signalling is a way of getting around the problem of cheap talk.

To me, signalling through cheap talk is like spam: it rarely works, but the costs are low and there's a lot of it about.

Comment author: ikrase 08 February 2013 02:35:43AM 0 points [-]

Alternatively, I can think of two other variations. 1. Talk is cheap, but not free in some cases. As a subset of this, you can signal for the benefit of one audience (possibly a minority of the overall population, or your own ingroup, by saying things that will meet with moderate or minor social disapproval from the rest of the population 2. People sometimes expect costs to exist even when they don't.

Comment author: Peterdjones 08 February 2013 12:30:41PM 0 points [-]

I was thinking more of people who make boasts that 99% of the audience would consider ridiculous. If they are already low status, the cost is low and they can still get an RoI on the 1%.