HalMorris comments on You can't signal to rubes - Less Wrong

7 Post author: Patrick 01 January 2013 06:40AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (115)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: philh 01 January 2013 11:29:21PM 3 points [-]

Sexual selection, first proposed by Darwin himself in this case: he thought peahens preferred peacocks with bigger tails, and so bigger tails evolved, regardless of expense in fitness.

This isn't an explanation until it can explain why peahens prefer peacocks with bigger tails. That's what the signalling hypothesis is for. I don't see why these are considered competing hypotheses.

Comment author: HalMorris 02 January 2013 12:29:53AM 2 points [-]

Do you suppose a cat's hiss tells another cat something about strength and fitness via lung-power?

That could explain their fear of vacuum cleaners and blow-driers.

Comment author: philh 02 January 2013 12:35:39AM 0 points [-]

I don't suppose that, and I assume you don't expect me to suppose that, but I don't know what you're trying to tell me.

Comment author: HalMorris 02 January 2013 01:33:55AM 0 points [-]

Sorry, should have made that an independent comment, not really an answer to anything in this thread. Just a pet theory brought to mind by all this talk of peacocks and signalling. Cats threaten each other with a toneless sound of rushing air, and and are afraid of high-powered mechanical devices that produce a version of the same effect.