= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
taelor comments on Rationality Quotes January 2013 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (604)
It's extremely inelegant, and finding yourself using one means you're running into a dead end.
I don't see why a complement would be inelegant. It's just one extra bit of specification.
Now, non-definable non-computable numbers (or sets), they are inelegant :-)