Meni_Rosenfeld comments on How not to sort by a complicated frequentist formula - Less Wrong

3 Post author: Meni_Rosenfeld 01 January 2013 09:58PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (26)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Meni_Rosenfeld 02 January 2013 10:26:45AM 2 points [-]

This is interesting, especially considering that it favors low-data items, as opposed to both the confidence-interval-lower-bound and the notability adjustment factor, which penalize low-data items.

You can try to optimize it in an explore-vs-exploit framework, but there would be a lot of modeling parameters, and additional kinds of data will need to be considered. Specifically, a measure of how many of those who viewed the item bothered to vote at all. Some comments will not get any votes simply because they are not that interesting; so if you keep placing them on top hoping to learn more about them, you'll end up with very few total votes because you show people things they don't care about.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 02 January 2013 10:29:20AM 3 points [-]

Yep. You'd want to check or guess the size of the user's monitor and where they were scrolling to, and calculate upvotes-per-actual-user-read. As things are read and not upvoted, your confidence that they're not super-high-value items increases and the value of information from showing them again diminishes.