GuySrinivasan comments on How not to sort by a complicated frequentist formula - Less Wrong

3 Post author: Meni_Rosenfeld 01 January 2013 09:58PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (26)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: GuySrinivasan 02 January 2013 06:20:27PM 0 points [-]

Some users' votes are not independent of the current net vote count. http://lesswrong.com/lw/7x/voting_etiquette/5ic

Comment author: [deleted] 02 January 2013 11:28:00PM *  0 points [-]

Guilty as charged.

Showing upvotes and downvotes separately would stop me (and, probably, other people) from doing that, but I'm kind of getting tired of beating this dead horse.

Comment author: Meni_Rosenfeld 02 January 2013 07:30:56PM *  0 points [-]

True. This is a problem since the current net vote count is mutable, while an individual vote, once cast, is not. You could try fitting a much more complicated model that can reproduce this behavior, calibrate it with A/B testing, etc. Or maybe try to prevent it by sorting according to quality, but not actually displaying the metrics.