It's an interesting perspective and it presents previous thinking on the subject in a more accessible manner.

Hence, one upvote. I don't know that it's worth sixty-three upvotes (I don't know that it's not), but I didn't upvote it sixty-three times. Also, I see from the comments that it's encouraged some interesting conversations (and perhaps some reading of the meta-ethics sequence, which I think is actually fairly well written if a little dense).

In other words, congratulations on writing something engaging! It's harder than it looks.