It's you who put it in bold letters. Perhaps you should start not emphasizing sentences which aren't important ones.

A sentence can be important without being the complete rendition of one's views on a topic: you're being dishonest (again).

Seriously, if you spent as much mental effort on bringing yourself up to speed with core concepts as you do on misdirection and trying to be everyone's schoolmarm, the community (for which you obviously purport to speak) would be better off.

I note that you didn't bleat like a retarded sheep and nitpick the idea to which I was responding, namely that morality was about maximising global awesomeness (or some other such straight-line-to-tyranny). No demand for a definitions of terms, no babble about how that won't do for coding your make-believe AI, no gabble about expression.

And last but not least - given that you've already exhibited 'bounded literacy': what gives you the right to judge anybody?

I'm not going demand that we compare academic transcripts - you don't have a hope on that metric - just some indication apart from "I feel strongly about this" will suffice. Preferably one that doesn't confuse the second person possessive with the second person (present tense) of the verb "to be".